Gympie Council considers 156 units | Gympie News | Local News in Gympie

Gympie Council considers 156 units

CAN you imagine walking out into your backyard and looking out across at four two-storey town houses?

Eileen Benstead, Elizabeth Shields, Sue Forrest and Sam Benstead.

CAN you imagine walking out into your backyard and looking out across at four two-storey town houses?

Sue Forrest now can after receiving a letter from Gympie Regional Council about a new development application near her property along Lyden Court.

Mrs Forrest has since viewed the plans for the development and discovered a proposal for 156 two-storey town houses to be built in the 4.42 hectares of land that backs on to her yard.

Instead of birds chirping and insects buzzing when she walks outside, she is worried the sounds she will hear in the future will be of up to 428 people living in the proposed development.

Local residents were so fired up on hearing about the proposal they submitted a list of objections to council and started a petition with more than 30 signatures to stop the development.

The proposal shows there will be one dwelling per 252sqm and each unit is about six metres wide by 12 metres long.

A community centre is also in the plan which incorporates a lap pool, hall, barbeque, kitchen and deck.

Mrs Forrest said she wasn’t against development, just the sheer density of the units. Sam and Eileen Benstead, who also live in Lyden Court, agree.

Mr Benstead said when he moved into his new home in a new estate off Old Maryborough Road he expected the rural outlook, which was a selling point, to stay, or thought the existing land might be sub-divided into housing blocks, but nothing like what was proposed.

MS Forrest said the proposal suggested a six-foot-high fence would be constructed along the boundary of the development but she said it wouldn’t screen much and people would still be able to look into her house.

Residents who signed the petition say they are worried about their properties being devalued and the possibility of an increase in crime if the town houses are approved.

In a letter to Gympie Regional Council, the Bensteads wrote the town houses would block the outlook from existing homes and “imprison” the people who live in them.

“I wonder who is going to want to live in them (units),” Mr Benstead said.

Other issues he had with the proposal were its residents being adversely affected by the presence of the saleyards, 800m away, and people being discouraged from moving to the area.

He wrote “the development would resemble a huge ‘ant hill’ with residents piled on top of each other”.

“The increased population in the area will lead to overcrowding, excessive noise from building, residents and traffic not only in the development area but in Heights Drive, Zoe Close, Madonna Place and Lyden Court as well as lighting and drainage problems.

“The reality is that this development is another example of greed, which is public enemy number one in today’s society. To have a development of this nature thrust upon residents who have moved to the area to live in peace and harmony is beyond comprehension and totally unacceptable.”

The Bensteads and Ms Forrest are also worried about people parking in near-by streets to access the units and traffic congestion which they said was already a nightmare.

Council is yet to consider the proposal which is still in the public notification stage.

The petition can still be signed by contacting Ms Forrest on 5482 3803 or Mr Benstead on 5482 8670.

 
Gympie Times  

Recent Comments

Add a Comment »

Posted by Southsider from Gympie, Queensland

19 March 2010 7:57 a.m. | Suggest removal » | Post reply »

Dollars will drive the development, not our useless overpaid councillors.

Posted by lukerevolution from Gympie, Queensland

19 March 2010 9:57 a.m. | Suggest removal » | Post reply »

It sounds like the complainants have their house, carved out of someone else's rural vista, so everyone else can go without. Streetview in maps.google.com.au show Lyden Court to be a fairly new suburb so we are not exactly talking about spoiling Gympie's historical precinct.

We sit right on the edge of the highest growth region of Australia. People wanting to build more houses shouldn't be a surprise.

156 units with its own pool, BBQ areas, etc sounds more like an over 55s village. The complainants will have friends-to-complain-about-progress-with on tap within a few years instead of the crime and traffic inconvenience feared.

Over 55/downsizing accommodation is not only in high demand, it is urgently needed. We need empty-nesters approaching retirement to give up their big, family houses to let young families get into the real estate market, or at least be able to afford the rent on a suitable property. What we will do with all these small homes when the baby boomers have finished with them is another question but we have coped with previous gluts of baby boomer cast-off before so I'm sure we will cope again.

Posted by RMITCHELL from Federal, Queensland

19 March 2010 11:22 a.m. | Suggest removal » | Post reply »

Years ago when we lived on the Sunshine Coast we had a similar situation in our area.
I am sorry for those people who will lose their rural outlook, think of the people who lost their rural outlook when you moved in.
As we said to the people complaining on the Sunshine Coast, if you want to maintain the rural or other outlook, the only option is to purchase the land in question and lock it up.
You cannot expect the landholder to forgoe his right to sell, divide or do what ever within the council guidelines.
Please put your self in their shoes.
The other consideration is that the more we spread out the more infrastructure that is required, the more cost per unit/house/block. the more funds that have to be found, concentrated development equals less infrastructure costs.
None of us wants to see our rates going up year after year to give a few a rural view.
The only way you may guarantee that view, is to purchase overlooking a national park or state forest and even then don't hold your breath!!!!
Remember the only thing constant is change.

Posted by weedypigeon from Australia, None

19 March 2010 5:48 p.m. | Suggest removal » | Post reply »

As has been the case for the previous 30+ years.
Thank the idiots who believe in growth at any cost.
One thing to consider is that some of the complainants are only immigrants to Qld anyway and they are part of the problem.

The sooner a million leave Qld the better off we'll all be.

Add a Comment

 
  • Mostly sunny

    Today

    Mostly sunny

    13°C/25°C
  • Mostly sunny

    Tomorrow

    Mostly sunny

    8°C/21°C

Gympie forecast »

Special offers
Leo

24 July - 23 August

Dreams, wishes, and fantasies about love are strong now, in fact, almost fanatical and you could be infatuated with someone you meet. Your imagination is vigorous... More Horoscopes »

Select your zodiac sign

Aries | Taurus | Gemini | Cancer | Leo | Virgo | Libra | Scorpio | Sagittarius | Capricorn | Aquarius | Pisces

What's On

Browse

 

powered by

Link to top
APN news and media

© APN News & Media Ltd 2010. Unauthorised reproduction is prohibited under the laws of Australia and by international treaty. APN | APN Group Websites

Back to access links